Gods Goddesses & Mythology

Is the Christmas Tree Pagan? What the Sources Say

An oak branch with green leaves and acorns beside a piece of bark and a slim lit candle

In 723 an Anglo-Saxon missionary fells an oak near Geismar in Hesse, and the people watching expect their god to strike him dead. He does not. Boniface builds a chapel from the wood.

Quick answer

Tree cult means the veneration of individual trees or groves as the seat or sign of the divine. For central Europe the sources are thin and specific: Tacitus (Germania, about AD 98) on sacred groves, the Vita Bonifatii on the oak at Geismar felled in 723, and the Frankish royal annals on the Saxon Irminsul destroyed in 772. Church councils and penitentials of the sixth to eighth centuries ban offerings at trees, which shows the practice long outlived conversion. The village linden as a court and dancing tree is medieval and Christian, not a Germanic survival. Fixed tree-to-god assignments, oak for Thor and linden for Freya, are nineteenth-century constructions. And the story that Boniface replaced the felled oak with a fir tree is not medieval at all: it was written by an American in 1897.

Evidence
Verified

Tacitus reports around AD 98 that the Germanic peoples worshipped their gods in groves and woods rather than in temples and images.

Source/tradition: Tacitus, Germania 9 and 39, as a Roman outsider's account containing ethnographic commonplaces

Verified

Boniface felled an oak sacred to Thunor at Geismar in 723, called robur Iovis in the Latin, and built a chapel from the timber.

Source/tradition: Willibald, Vita Bonifatii (about 760), c. 6 — hagiography containing a miracle, core event undisputed

Verified

Charlemagne destroyed the Saxon Irminsul in 772; it was an erected wooden pillar or tree trunk of cultic significance.

Source/tradition: Annales regni Francorum ad 772; Rudolf of Fulda, Translatio s. Alexandri (about 865)

Verified

Church prohibitions of offerings at trees (Indiculus superstitionum, councils of Tours 567 and Nantes, Admonitio generalis 789) show the practice continued into the eighth century and beyond.

Source/tradition: Indiculus superstitionum et paganiarum (8th c.), c. 6, de sacris silvarum quae nimidas vocant; conciliar acts

Verified

From the high Middle Ages into the nineteenth century, court was held, dancing took place and announcements were read under village lindens; dancing lindens trained over stone pillars survive in Franconia.

Source/tradition: Weistuemer, court records, surviving dance and court lindens at Peesten and Effeltrich

Verified

The story that Boniface pointed to a fir tree after felling the oak and named it the tree of the Christ child was written by the American author Henry van Dyke in 1897.

Source/tradition: Henry van Dyke, The First Christmas Tree (1897); absent from Willibald and from all medieval sources

Verified

The decorated indoor Christmas tree is documented from the early seventeenth century in and around Strasbourg and spread through the United States with German-speaking immigrants in the nineteenth century.

Source/tradition: Strasbourg municipal records of 1605; Godey's Lady's Book, December 1850, which reprinted the Illustrated London News engraving of 1848 with the royal insignia removed

Not proven

The Irminsul stood at the Externsteine.

Source/tradition: No source names the location; the identification comes from Wilhelm Teudt (1929) and is archaeologically unsupported

Not proven

The linden was consecrated to the goddess Freya or Frigg in Germanic paganism.

Source/tradition: No pre-Christian source; the assignment arises in nineteenth-century mythography following Jacob Grimm and has been copied ever since

Traditional

The veneration of the oak as the tree of the thunder god is an Indo-European pattern also found among Greeks (Zeus at Dodona), Balts (Perkunas) and Slavs (Perun).

Source/tradition: Comparative religion; for the Germanic area inferred from the Geismar oak and name parallels only

Lived practice

People seek out old trees today to ground themselves, to meditate or to leave offerings.

Source/tradition: Widespread practice in nature spirituality and modern paganism

Not proven

Touching or standing near a tree transfers energy or heals.

Source/tradition: No evidence; studies of time spent in forests measure stress reduction, not transfer

VERIFIED = verifiable in scientific or official sources · TRADITIONAL = historically or culturally recorded · LIVED PRACTICE = widely practiced, experiential knowledge · NOT PROVEN = spiritual interpretation, not scientifically established.

That scene is the most famous image of central European tree cult, and it is also very nearly the only one with a contemporary source. Everything else — the Irminsul, the sacred groves, the court linden, the tree alphabets — is either thinly attested, later, or invented outright. Including, as it happens, the part Americans know best: that Boniface then pointed at a fir tree and gave the world Christmas. That was written in New Jersey in 1897.

What tree cult means, and what it does not

The term comes from nineteenth-century religious studies and means the veneration of individual trees or whole groves as the dwelling, sign or embodiment of the divine. Two things get constantly confused and need separating: the tree as a place of cult — where people sacrifice, judge, swear — and the tree as an object of cult, venerated in itself. The sources for central Europe show almost exclusively the first. That Germanic peoples "worshipped trees" is the formula of Christian missionaries who had no interest in the distinction. What people were doing was closer to: making contact with the divine at a particular tree. The tree was the address, not the recipient.

And a second caveat before we start. There is no Germanic source about Germanic tree cult. Everything we have comes from Romans looking in from outside and from Christians who wanted to abolish what they were describing. That does not make the reports false. It means they have a direction.

Tacitus and the sacred groves

The oldest description is in the Germania of Tacitus, around AD 98. The Germanic peoples, he writes, considered it incompatible with the greatness of the gods to shut them inside walls or represent them in human shape; they consecrated woods and groves and gave the names of gods to that mysterious thing they saw only in reverence. Later he describes the grove of the Semnones, which no one might enter unbound, and the grove of the goddess Nerthus on an island in the sea.

That is a great deal and very little at once. A great deal, because it attests the basic shape: the cult site is a piece of forest, not a building. Very little, because Tacitus was never in Germania, because he drew the Germanic peoples as noble counter-images to soft Romans, and because "grove" is a literary commonplace he also applied to Celts and Britons. Archaeology at least confirms the bog and spring deposits that fit a cult landscape without temples. Tacitus names no individual sacred tree.

Donar's Oak: the one tree with a source

The account comes from Willibald, a priest at Mainz, who wrote the life of Boniface around 760, some forty years after the event. At Geismar in Hesse, he writes, stood an oak of extraordinary size that the heathens called robur Iovis — the oak of Jupiter, which in the Latin rendering of Germanic conditions means Thunor or Donar. Boniface struck at it in the presence of a hostile crowd, and before he was through it broke into four parts by a divine gust of wind. The heathens abandoned their cursing and praised God; from the timber the missionary built an oratory in honour of Saint Peter.

What in that is historical? The wind and the four parts are hagiography — the miracle every saint's life needs. The oak, the place, the felling and the building of the chapel are considered credible, because Willibald could question people from Boniface's circle and because the story mattered too much to the mission to be invented freely. Excavations at Fritzlar have found traces of an early wooden church, but no stump.

The decisive thing is what the scene presupposes: a tree that belongs to a god; a community that expects the god to defend it; and the experience that he does not. Tree cult does not end here through argument. It ends through a test.

The Irminsul: pillar, trunk or tree?

In 772 Charlemagne marched against the Saxons and destroyed, according to the royal annals, the Irminsul — a sanctuary he had dismantled over three days and whose gold and silver he carried off. A later report by Rudolf of Fulda describes it as an erected tree trunk of no small size, worshipped under the open sky, whose name meant "universal column, the column that sustains all".

That is all we know. Whether the Irminsul was a living tree, a stripped trunk or a carved pillar; whether there was one or several; where exactly it stood — the sources are silent. The connection with Yggdrasil, the world tree of Norse tradition, suggests itself and is nonetheless an interpretation: Yggdrasil was written down in thirteenth-century Iceland, the Irminsul destroyed in eighth-century Saxony, and between them lie five hundred years and a sea.

That the Irminsul stood at the Externsteine is a twentieth-century claim. It comes from Wilhelm Teudt, who in 1929 wanted to see a toppled Irminsul in the bent tree on the Descent from the Cross relief, and it was taken up enthusiastically by the volkisch movement. There is no source for it.

What the church banned, and thereby recorded

The most revealing sources are the ones that do not narrate but prohibit. The Council of Tours in 567 instructs priests to expel from the church those who make vows at trees, springs or stones. The Indiculus superstitionum, a Frankish list of heathen customs from the eighth century, lists at point six "the sanctuaries of the woods which they call nimidas" — a word related to the Celtic nemeton, sanctuary. Penitentials set out how long a person must fast who prays at a tree or lights candles there. Charlemagne's Admonitio generalis of 789 expressly forbids lights and offerings at trees.

Such texts prove two things: that the practice was widespread — nobody bans what nobody does — and that it outlived Christianity by centuries, not as a religion but as a habit. A piece of bread at the root, a ribbon in the branch, an oath under the crown. The church eventually solved the problem not by felling but by rededication: images of the Virgin were hung in oaks, chapels built beside lindens, and "Our Lady of the Oak" survives as a place name to this day.

The sacred trees of central Europe

Tree What the sources say What was added later
Oak Donar's Oak at Geismar (723); oaks as cult trees also among Celts, Balts, Slavs and at Dodona The "German oak" as a national symbol from about 1800, oak leaves on coins and decorations
Ash Yggdrasil in the Edda (Iceland, 13th c.); no source for central Europe Transfer of the Norse world tree onto the Irminsul
Linden Court, dance and village linden from the high Middle Ages; the tree of love in Minnesang Assignment to Freya or Frigg — no pagan source, 19th century
Yew In churchyards of the British Isles since the Middle Ages; wood for bows and rune staves "Celtic tree of death" — generalised from a few Irish references
Elder Early modern folk belief: raise your hat to the elder, house tree, do not fell it Frau Holle as an elder goddess — a word association, not a source

The smell of the season, honestly labelled

Cedar, Orange & Cinnamon Smudge Stick

A four-inch bundle of cedar with orange peel and cinnamon. We are not going to tell you it is Germanic, because it is not: cedar in this trade is North American, the bundle format is modern, and the sources in this article describe standing trees, not bundles. What it is, is the smell most Americans associate with December, in a form you can light in a bowl. If you want the older thing, that one is free and stands outside. $7.95

See the bundle →

The village linden: the sacred tree that is Christian

Anyone looking for surviving tree cult finds it not in the forest but on the village square. Court was held under the linden from the thirteenth into the nineteenth century — hundreds of legal customaries name the court linden as the place of hearing. Announcements were read there, festivals held, and in Franconia there still stand dancing lindens whose branches were trained across stone pillars to form a dance floor. The linden is the tree of community, of public speech and of love; Walther von der Vogelweide set it at the centre of the most famous love song of the Middle Ages around 1200.

And precisely here is the trap. Because the linden was so obviously "sacred", nineteenth-century mythography gave it a pagan past: it had been consecrated to Freya, the tree of love already among the Germanic peoples. There is not one pre-Christian source for this. The village linden is a Christian medieval institution that may — may — attach to older habits of assembling under trees. More than that cannot be said. Anyone venerating a linden as Freya's tree today is doing something lovely; they should only know that they are following an idea from 1835, not from 735.

America has this too, and it is worth noticing

If the court linden sounds foreign, it should not. The United States has its own version of the tree that is a place rather than an object, and it is younger and better documented.

In 1765 an elm on Hanover Square in Boston became the Liberty Tree: protests were staged under it, effigies hung from it, announcements made beneath it. British troops and loyalists cut it down for firewood in 1775, which tells you exactly how much of a symbol it had become. In Hartford, the Charter Oak carried the legend of the colonial charter hidden in its hollow in 1687; when the tree came down in a storm in 1856 the city held something close to a funeral. In Philadelphia, the Treaty Elm at Shackamaxon was said to be where William Penn made his agreement with the Lenape — a story that appears first in the eighteenth century and is itself a construction, exactly like the Freya linden.

Same structure, different continent: a specific tree becomes the address for oaths, law and community; a later century supplies the tree with a deeper meaning it did not originally carry; and the wood ends up in relics — Charter Oak timber was turned into chairs, gavels and boxes for decades afterwards. Boniface built a chapel from his oak. Hartford built furniture.

So is the Christmas tree pagan?

Here is the short version, and it disappoints both sides.

The legend is not medieval. The story in which Boniface, having felled the oak, points to a small fir growing behind it and declares it the tree of the Christ child appears in no medieval source. It was written by Henry van Dyke, an American Presbyterian minister and later Princeton professor, in his 1897 story "The First Christmas Tree". It is a good story. It is fiction, written eleven hundred and seventy-four years after the event it describes, and it is the origin of nearly every "did you know the Christmas tree comes from a pagan oak" post you have ever read.

The actual tree is early modern and urban. Decorated indoor evergreens are documented from the early seventeenth century in and around Strasbourg, in guild halls and burgher houses. They are a late, regional, thoroughly Christian custom that then spread — carried to Pennsylvania and the Midwest by German-speaking immigrants, and made fashionable nationally when Godey's Lady's Book reprinted the 1848 Illustrated London News engraving of Victoria and Albert's tree in December 1850, with the queen's crown and the prince's sash carefully edited out so the family would read as American.

What is genuinely old is narrower. Bringing greenery indoors at midwinter is attested in the Roman world and elsewhere, and the general reverence for evergreens is older than any of these records. But "evergreens in winter are old" is not the same claim as "the Christmas tree is a survival of Germanic tree worship", and the second one has no evidence behind it at all.

The honest answer to a relative at dinner: the tree is not a pagan relic, the famous origin story is American fiction from 1897, and none of that is a reason to like it less. For what December actually inherits, see winter solstice rituals and — for the same test applied to an autumn festival — is Mabon ancient.

The nineteenth century invents the whole thing again

Most of what circulates today about Germanic tree cult comes not from the early Middle Ages but from the century of the Brothers Grimm. Jacob Grimm's Deutsche Mythologie of 1835 assembled folk customs, place names and old texts into a picture of Germanic religion far more systematic than the sources support; tree-to-god assignments like oak-Donar, ash-Wotan, linden-Freya were built there and by his followers into a rule book. In parallel the oak became the symbol of the German nation, and the "German forest" the place where a young nation went looking for roots. The volkisch movement and later National Socialism took these images over; the Externsteine with their invented Irminsul are the best-known example.

That does not mean all of it is false. It means you have to know the layers. Under the oak there really is an old cult; under the linden there is a medieval village square; and under the tree table with its nine gods there is a writing desk in Kassel.

What we do not promise

We do not claim that touching a tree transfers energy or heals anything. Studies of time spent in woodland measure stress reduction, which is a different claim and a real one.

We do not claim there is an unbroken line from a Saxon grove to a modern practice. The line is broken in several places, and the breaks are where the nineteenth century did its work.

And we do not claim that any of this makes what you do at a tree less worth doing. The reverence is old. The rule book is not.

Practically: how to work with this

Go to a specific tree, not to trees in general. Everything in the sources is about one named tree in one place. That is the transferable part.

Leave nothing that does not rot. Ribbons, wire, coins in bark and nailed offerings damage the tree and, in a US park or on public land, may be illegal. A handful of something organic at the root is the old gesture and does no harm.

Learn the species before you assign it a meaning. Oak, linden, ash, yew and elder are five different organisms with five different histories. The tables that assign each one a deity are younger than your house.

Ask which century. For any claim about a sacred tree: which source, which century? Where no answer comes, you are reading reception, not tradition.

Frequently asked questions

Did Boniface really cut down Donar's Oak?
The felling at Geismar in 723 and the chapel built from the wood are considered historical. The miraculous wind that split the tree into four parts is hagiography, added by the genre.

Is the Christmas tree a pagan survival?
No, on the evidence. The decorated indoor tree is documented from the early seventeenth century around Strasbourg. The story linking it to Boniface's oak was written by the American author Henry van Dyke in 1897.

What was the Irminsul?
A Saxon sanctuary destroyed by Charlemagne in 772, described by a later source as an erected wooden trunk worshipped under open sky. Whether it was a living tree, a stripped trunk or a carved pillar is unknown, and no source records where it stood.

Was the linden sacred to Freya?
There is no pre-Christian source for it. The assignment comes from nineteenth-century mythography following Jacob Grimm. The linden's documented role is as a court, dance and assembly tree from the high Middle Ages.

Did Germanic peoples worship trees?
The sources show trees and groves used as places of cult — offerings, oaths, judgments — rather than trees venerated as gods in themselves. The "tree worship" formula comes from missionaries who had no interest in the distinction.

What is the best evidence that the practice continued?
The bans. Councils, penitentials and Charlemagne's own capitulary of 789 forbid lights and offerings at trees, which means people were still doing it centuries after conversion.

Where to go next

For the site where the invented Irminsul still draws visitors, see the Externsteine and the man who put it there, Wilhelm Teudt. For the tree alphabet question, ogham and what it actually is. For the season this article lands in, winter solstice rituals.

Sources: Tacitus, Germania 9, 39-40 · Willibald, Vita Bonifatii c. 6 (about 760) · Annales regni Francorum ad 772 · Rudolf of Fulda, Translatio s. Alexandri (about 865) · Indiculus superstitionum et paganiarum, c. 6 · Admonitio generalis (789) · Jacob Grimm, Deutsche Mythologie (1835) · Henry van Dyke, The First Christmas Tree (1897) · Godey's Lady's Book, December 1850.

Questions about an order or anything on this site: 28@templeofdesire.com.

Back to the Desire Diaries