Divination & Mediumship

How to See Auras: Exercises and an Honest Look

The exercises reliably work. Three of them, the colour conventions, and the two well-described properties of human vision that account for most of what people see.

Woman with closed eyes and a soft violet glow of light around her head and shoulders.
Quick answer

Aura seeing in practice depends on soft, peripheral, unfocused looking combined with stillness rather than hard staring, because rod cells concentrated away from the centre of the retina pick up faint contrast better at the edge of the visual field. Conditions do most of the work: soft indirect light, a plain white or cream background without pattern, a relaxed body and patience. Three exercises build on each other - your own splayed hand about 12 inches from a wall while you look through the fingers at the wall behind, the soft gaze practised on a candle flame in a dim room, and a person seated against a pale wall with your gaze resting just behind their shoulder. As a rough colour guide, practitioners read red as vitality, orange as creativity, yellow as intellect, green as healing, blue as calm, violet as intuition and white as high attunement. Two well-described effects, Troxler fading and the complementary afterimage, reliably produce this experience in anyone with working eyes, and the afterimage explanation is testable: the aura often turns out to be the opposite colour of what the person is wearing. A subtle energy field has not been demonstrated, aura reading is not diagnosis, and persistent flashes or floaters need an eye doctor.

Evidence
Verified

Rod cells, concentrated away from the centre of the retina, detect faint contrast better peripherally than centrally, which is why soft unfocused looking is the basis of the exercises.

Source/tradition: Standard visual physiology

Verified

Troxler fading, described by Ignaz Troxler in 1804, causes unchanging peripheral stimuli to fade from awareness within seconds under a steady gaze - the exact condition these exercises create.

Source/tradition: Troxler, 1804; perception research

Verified

Sustained fixation on a colour produces a complementary-coloured afterimage through cone adaptation, which predicts that a perceived aura will often be the opposite colour of the subject's clothing.

Source/tradition: Standard perception literature on afterimages

Verified

Kirlian photography records corona discharge, an electrical ionisation effect dependent on moisture and grounding that appears around inanimate objects as readily as around fingertips.

Source/tradition: Standard physical explanation of corona discharge

Traditional

Walter Kilner published claims in 1911 that a human aura could be seen through dicyanin-dyed screens; the claims did not replicate.

Source/tradition: Kilner, 1911, and subsequent non-replication

Lived practice

The hand exercise, the candle gaze and observing a person against a pale background are the established introductory exercises.

Source/tradition: Aura and clairvoyance training practice

Not proven

Every living body is surrounded by a subtle energy field of several layers reflecting physical, emotional, mental and spiritual states.

Source/tradition: Esoteric teaching; not scientifically demonstrated

Not proven

Particular aura colours indicate specific characteristics, health states or futures of a person.

Source/tradition: Aura interpretation; not a medical or psychological diagnosis

VERIFIED = verifiable in scientific or official sources · TRADITIONAL = historically or culturally recorded · LIVED PRACTICE = widely practiced, experiential knowledge · NOT PROVEN = spiritual interpretation, not scientifically established.

The exercises work. What you are seeing is the interesting question.

Hold your hand against a pale wall, soften your gaze, and within a minute most people see a faint band of light along the edge of the fingers. That is not a trick and it is not imagination — it is reliable enough that you can produce it on demand. The honest article is not about whether you will see something. It is about what the something is.

Quick answer: Aura seeing in practice depends on soft, peripheral, unfocused looking combined with stillness — not hard staring, because the eye's rod cells, concentrated away from the centre of the retina, pick up faint contrast better at the edge of the visual field than dead centre. Conditions do most of the work: soft indirect light rather than glare or darkness, a plain white or cream background with no pattern, a relaxed body, and patience. Three exercises build on each other — your own splayed hand about 12 inches from the wall while you look through the fingers at the wall behind, the soft gaze practised on a candle flame in a dim room, and finally a person seated against a pale wall with your gaze resting on a point just behind their shoulder. As a rough colour guide, practitioners read red as vitality, orange as creativity, yellow as intellect, green as healing, blue as calm and communication, violet as intuition, white as high attunement. Here is the part usually left out: two well-described visual effects, Troxler fading and the complementary afterimage, reliably produce exactly this experience in anyone with working eyes, and the afterimage explanation predicts something testable — the "aura" often turns out to be the opposite colour of what the person is wearing. A subtle energy field has not been demonstrated. Aura reading is not diagnosis; if you see persistent flashes, floaters or shimmering, see an eye doctor.

Start with what reliably happens

Almost everyone can produce the basic effect within a couple of minutes, which puts this in an unusual category: a psychic exercise with a near-guaranteed result. That reliability is the reason the practice has lasted, and it is also the reason it deserves a careful explanation rather than a dismissive one.

What you get first is a narrow, colourless or faintly tinted band hugging the outline — usually described as the etheric layer. With more practice, people report broader and more coloured impressions further out. The first is nearly universal. The second varies enormously between individuals, which is itself a useful clue.

Setting up properly

Conditions matter more here than technique, and most failed attempts are failures of setup.

  • Soft indirect light. Not an overhead fixture, not darkness. Dusk light, or a lamp in an adjoining room.
  • A plain pale background. White or cream, no pattern, no texture. Patterned wallpaper makes the effect nearly impossible to isolate.
  • A still body. A few slow breaths, shoulders down, jaw unclenched. Tension pulls the gaze back into hard focus without your noticing.
  • Time. Give it a genuine five minutes. Thirty seconds of impatient staring produces eye strain and nothing else.

The three exercises

One — your own hand

Hold your hand up with the fingers splayed, roughly 12 inches in front of a plain pale wall. Do not look at your fingers. Look through the gap between them at the wall behind, and let your focus settle there. After thirty to sixty seconds a fine band usually appears along the finger edges. Move the hand slowly — the band typically moves with it.

Two — the candle gaze

In a dimmed room, rest your gaze near a candle flame without fixing on it. Let the visual field go wide and soft until the halo around the flame seems to grow and take on colour. This exercise is not about the candle; it is about training the loose, unfocused looking that the third exercise needs.

Three — another person

Ask someone to sit against a pale wall. Rest your gaze on a point just behind their shoulder or slightly above their head — not on their face, which pulls you straight back into hard focus. Hold it steadily and without effort. A pale band along the head and shoulders usually comes first; anything further is what varies.

From the shop

Brazilian Amethyst Druze, Medium

A raw geode piece for the corner of the room you practise in. Not a tool for seeing — a marker that this particular spot is where you sit still, which is most of what a practice space has to do.

$36.95
View this piece

The two effects that explain most of it

This is the section the genre usually skips, and it is the most interesting part.

Troxler fading

Described by Ignaz Troxler in 1804: hold your gaze still on a fixed point and unchanging stimuli in the periphery begin to fade from awareness within seconds. The visual system is built to report change, and it actively suppresses what stays constant. Now notice what the exercises above all require — a steady, unmoving, softly defocused gaze. That is the precise recipe for Troxler fading. The background dissolves, edges destabilise, and what remains is a shifting boundary region around the object you were not quite looking at.

The complementary afterimage

The second effect is sharper, because it makes a prediction you can check. Stare at a colour for thirty seconds and the cone cells responding to it adapt; look at a white surface and you see the complement — the opposite colour on the wheel. Green produces magenta, blue produces yellow, red produces cyan.

Try this before you read on. Have someone sit against a white wall in a strongly coloured top — a red one is ideal. Practise on them for two or three minutes. Then ask yourself what colour the aura appeared to be. If red clothing produced a green or cyan surround, you have just watched your own retina do it, and you can verify it by repeating with a different shirt colour and seeing whether the "aura" changes to match. This is a genuine test you can run this evening, and it is worth running honestly, because a practice that has not tested itself is not a practice, it is a habit.

Neither effect makes the experience fake. You are genuinely seeing something and your description of it is accurate. What is in question is the cause — and the ordinary explanation accounts for the reliability, the edge-hugging shape, the colourless first layer and the colour relationships, without needing an additional field.

Two footnotes from the history

Kilner's screens. In 1911 the English physician Walter Kilner published work claiming a human aura could be seen through screens containing dicyanin dye. The claim did not replicate, the dye is now understood to have affected the observer's vision rather than revealing anything, and the episode is chiefly interesting as an early attempt to test the thing rather than assert it.

Kirlian photography. The glowing outlines produced by the technique developed in the Soviet Union from 1939 are corona discharge — ionisation around an object in a high-voltage field. The glow varies with moisture, pressure and grounding, and it appears around coins and keys as readily as around fingertips. It is a real and rather beautiful physical phenomenon. It is not a photograph of an aura.

Worth adding: a small number of people do report consistent, involuntary colour experiences attached to particular individuals. That is studied under synaesthesia, it appears to be genuine for those who have it, and it is quite different from a learnable skill — it is not something an exercise produces.

Reading colours, held loosely

Colour Usual reading
Red Vitality, drive, physical energy
Orange Creativity, sociability
Yellow Intellect, optimism
Green Healing, heart, balance
Blue Calm, communication, truthfulness
Violet Intuition, spiritual attention
White Clarity, high attunement

These readings are a modern Western convention rather than an ancient scheme, and they overlap heavily with the chakra colour ladder for the same historical reasons. Given the afterimage effect above, the honest instruction is to check what the person is wearing before you interpret the colour you saw. We go through the conventional meanings in more depth in aura colours and what they are said to mean.

When this is an eye appointment, not a practice. Deliberately induced effects stop when you stop. Visual disturbances that arrive on their own do not, and some of them are urgent. A sudden increase in floaters, flashes of light, a curtain or shadow moving across your vision, or a shimmering arc that spreads over ten to thirty minutes are matters for an optometrist, ophthalmologist or doctor — a retinal tear is time-critical, and a spreading visual disturbance is more likely migraine aura than anything spiritual. Never read someone's aura as information about their health, and never let an aura reading stand in for a medical opinion, your own or anyone else's.

The mistakes that stop people

  • Staring hard. The single most common error. Focus destroys the effect; the whole method is soft looking.
  • Tension. Gripping the attention is the same mistake in the body.
  • A busy background. Patterned walls make it nearly impossible to isolate what you are seeing.
  • Quitting at thirty seconds. The first band typically needs a full minute of stillness.
  • Deciding in advance. Expecting violet is an excellent way to see violet. Note what appears before you interpret it.

What we don't promise

There is no demonstrated evidence for a subtle energy field surrounding the body, and the experiences these exercises produce are well accounted for by known properties of human vision. We are not claiming you will perceive anything beyond that, that aura colours reveal a person's character, health or future, or that any of this should inform a decision about your wellbeing or anyone else's. What the practice genuinely offers is unusual and worthwhile in its own right: a disciplined study of your own perception, and a firsthand demonstration of how much of what you see is constructed rather than received.

Frequently asked questions

Can anyone learn to see auras?

Nearly everyone can produce the basic effect — a faint band along an outline — within a few minutes using soft peripheral gaze against a plain pale background. What varies widely is whether anything beyond that appears.

Why does hard staring not work?

Because the effect depends on unfocused peripheral vision. Rod cells, which pick up faint contrast, are concentrated away from the centre of the retina, and hard focus works against exactly what you are trying to notice.

What is Troxler fading?

An effect described in 1804: with a steady gaze, unchanging stimuli in peripheral vision fade from awareness within seconds. The steady soft gaze used in aura exercises is precisely the condition that produces it.

How can I test whether I'm seeing an afterimage?

Have someone sit against a white wall in a strongly coloured top and check whether the surround you see is the complementary colour — green or cyan against red, for instance. Then repeat with a different shirt colour and see whether it changes to match.

Does Kirlian photography show the aura?

No. It records corona discharge, an electrical ionisation effect that varies with moisture and grounding and appears around inanimate objects such as coins just as readily as around fingertips.

Can aura colours tell me about someone's health?

No, and it should not be used that way. There is no evidence linking perceived aura colours to health, and treating a reading as medical information risks delaying real care.

I keep seeing flashes or shimmering — is that an aura?

Treat it as a medical question first. Sudden floaters, flashes, a shadow crossing your vision, or a spreading shimmering arc need an eye doctor; retinal problems are time-critical and spreading visual disturbance is commonly migraine aura.

Sources & further reading

  • Rod and cone distribution and peripheral contrast sensitivity — standard visual physiology.
  • Troxler fading, first described by Ignaz Troxler, 1804.
  • Complementary afterimages and cone adaptation — standard perception literature.
  • Walter Kilner's dicyanin screen claims, 1911, and their non-replication.
  • Kirlian photography as corona discharge — standard physical explanation.

Questions about an order or a piece? Write to 28@templeofdesire.com.

Back to the Desire Diaries